Testrun of Houdini 5 finished. CLONE TESTING ?

Hardware: i7-2630QM 2.0GHz Notebook, Windows 10 64bit, 4GB RAM
Fritzmark: singlecore: 3.97 / 1905 (all engines running on one core, only), average meganodes/s displayed by LittleBlitzerGUI: Houdini: 2.0 mn/s, Stockfish: 1.7 mn/s
Hash: 128MB per engine
GUI: LittleBlitzerGUI (draw at 120 moves, resign at 450cp (for 4 moves))
Tablebases: None
Openings: 10moves_SALC_500.epd (download the file at the "Download & Links"-section)
Ponder, Large Memory Pages & learning: Off
Thinking time: 70''+700ms per game/engine (average game-duration: 3.5 minutes)(standardized to the hardware-speed and the thinking time of the excellent [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]). One 7000 games-testrun takes about 6 days (running on only 3 of 4 cores). The version-numbers of the Stockfish-development engines are the release-date, written backwards (year,month,day))(example: 141028 = October, 28, 2014), downloaded at [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] I always use the latest version of one day, if more than one version per day is released. And I use the version "for modern computers". (At the moment, the compiles for modern windows machines on abrok.eu are around 8% slower, so I dont use them anymore)
 
Each Stockfish-version plays 1000 games against Komodo 10.2, Houdini 5, Shredder 13, Gull 3, Fire 4, Critter 1.6a and Equinox 3.3.
 
Latest update: 2016/11/22: Houdini 5
 
Download the individual statistics [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
 
     Program                    Elo    +    -   Games   Score   Av.Op.  Draws
   1 BrainFish 161009 numa    : 3464    8    8  7000    85.0 %   3147   24.7 %
   2 asmFish 161004 x64       : 3417    7    7  7000    81.5 %   3147   29.2 %
   3 Stockfish 8 161101       : 3390    6    6  9000    75.8 %   3177   35.3 %
   4 Houdini 5 x64            : 3369    6    6  7000    72.0 %   3190   36.8 % (new)
   5 Komodo 10.2 x64          : 3325    6    6  9000    67.9 %   3184   34.4 %
   6 Komodo 10.1 x64          : 3319    6    6  8000    65.0 %   3199   33.3 %
   7 Houdini 4 x64            : 3192    5    5 11000    44.7 %   3238   34.7 %
   8 Shredder 13 x64          : 3184    5    5  8000    46.5 %   3213   39.2 %
   9 Gull 3 x64               : 3121    5    5 12000    33.8 %   3255   36.7 %
  10 Fire 4 x64               : 3113    5    5 12000    32.8 %   3256   37.9 %
  11 Critter 1.6a x64         : 3108    5    5 12000    32.2 %   3256   34.5 %
  12 Equinox 3.3 x64          : 3090    5    5 12000    30.1 %   3258   34.9 %
  13 Mars 3.41 x64            : 3090    5    5 10000    30.7 %   3254   34.5 %
Below you find a diagram of the progress of Stockfish in my tests since the end of 2016. 
And below that diagram, the older diagrams.
 
You can save the diagrams (as a JPG-picture (in originial size)) on your PC with mouseclick (right button) and then choose "save image"...
The Elo-ratings of older Stockfish dev-versions in the Ordo-calculation can be a little different to the Elo-"dots" in the diagram, because the results/games of new Stockfish dev-versions - when getting part of the Ordo-calculation - can change the Elo-ratings of the opponent engines and that can change the Elo-ratings of older Stockfish dev-versions (in the Ordo-calculation / ratinglist, but not in the diagram, where all Elo-"dots" are the rating of one Stockfish dev-version at the moment, when the testrun of that Stockfish dev-version was finished).