"B" Admin
Posts : 1201 Reputation : 4017 Join date : 2010-01-17 Location : undetermined
| Subject: Latest abrok Development Versions June 17th (SF The gift that keeps on giving ) Wed Jun 17, 2020 10:16 am | |
|
Windows x64 for Haswell CPUs Windows x64 for modern computers Windows x64 Windows 32 Linux x64 for Haswell CPUs Linux x64 for modern computers Linux x64 | Author: Vizvezdenec Date: Wed Jun 17 07:41:59 2020 +0200 Timestamp: 1592372519 More reduction for evading pawn moves. pawn moves are irreversable unlike other evading moves; pawn is the least valuable piece in the game. So it makes a lot of sence to assume that evading pawn moves are on average not as good as other evading moves thus can be reduced more. Passed STC https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5ee9602e563bc7aa756002dc LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.50,1.50} Total: 94176 W: 17993 L: 17668 D: 58515 Elo +1.20 Ptnml(0-2): 1634, 10742, 21989, 11111, 1612 Passed LTC https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5ee97342563bc7aa75600301 LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.75} Total: 20432 W: 2572 L: 2354 D: 15506 Elo +3.71 Ptnml(0-2): 146, 1707, 6280, 1949, 134 closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/2749 Bench: 5073064 | Windows x64 for Haswell CPUs Windows x64 for modern computers Windows x64 Windows 32 Linux x64 for Haswell CPUs Linux x64 for modern computers Linux x64 | Author: Stéphane Nicolet Date: Wed Jun 17 07:35:58 2020 +0200 Timestamp: 1592372158 Small bonus to favor thorn pawns We increase a little bit the midgame value of pawns on a4, h4, a6 and h6. Original idea by Malcolm Campbell, who tried the version restricted to the pawns on the H column a couple of weeks ago and got a patch which almost passed LTC. The current pull request just adds the same idea for pawns on the A column. Possible follow-ups: maybe tweak the a5/h5 pawn values, and/or add a malus for very low king mobility in midgame? STC: LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.50,1.50} Total: 33416 W: 6516 L: 6275 D: 20625 Elo +2.51 Ptnml(0-2): 575, 3847, 7659, 4016, 611 https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5ee6c4e687586124bc2c10d4 LTC: LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.75} Total: 134368 W: 16869 L: 16319 D: 101180 Elo +1.42 Ptnml(0-2): 908, 12083, 40708, 12521, 964 https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5ee74e60aae8aec816ab756a closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/2747 Bench: 5299456 | Windows x64 for Haswell CPUs Windows x64 for modern computers Windows x64 Windows 32 Linux x64 for Haswell CPUs Linux x64 for modern computers Linux x64 | Author: mstembera Date: Wed Jun 17 07:32:16 2020 +0200 Timestamp: 1592371936 Use 128 bit multiply for TT index Remove super cluster stuff from TT and just use a 128 bit multiply. STC https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5ee719b3aae8aec816ab7548 LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {-1.50,0.50} Total: 12736 W: 2502 L: 2333 D: 7901 Elo +4.61 Ptnml(0-2): 191, 1452, 2944, 1559, 222 LTC https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5ee732d1aae8aec816ab7556 LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) {-1.50,0.50} Total: 27584 W: 3431 L: 3350 D: 20803 Elo +1.02 Ptnml(0-2): 173, 2500, 8400, 2511, 208 Scheme back to being derived from https://lemire.me/blog/2016/06/27/a-fast-alternative-to-the-modulo-reduction/ Also the default optimized version of the index calculation now uses fewer instructions. https://godbolt.org/z/Tktxbv Might benefit from mulx (requires -mbmi2) closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/2744 bench: 4320954 |
_________________ looking for Bettina
| |
|