stockfish tests

---

   


 Stockfish 070913 = 480 GAMES

Bench: 3864419 Timestamp: 1378549844

i7 980 3.33 Ghz.
6 real cores
Ponder: Off.
GUI: Fritz 12
Book: Perfect 2012c
No tablebases
Hash 512
Relative Speed: 28.66
Knodes per second: 13.759

Time Control_4+0

Stockfish 070913 64 SSE4.2_ - Critter 1.6a 64-bit_NOB 22.5 - 17.5 +12/=21/-7 56.25%
Stockfish 070913 64 SSE4.2_ - Houdini 3 Pro x64_6 22.5 - 17.5 +12/=21/-7 56.25%
Stockfish 070913 64 SSE4.2_ - Komodo 5.1r2 64-bitx6nob 22.5 - 17.5 +12/=21/-7 56.25%

Time Control_2+2

Stockfish 070913 64 SSE4.2_ - Critter 1.6a 64-bit_NOB 24.5 - 15.5 +14/=21/-5 61.25%
Stockfish 070913 64 SSE4.2_ - Houdini 3 Pro x64_6 20.0 - 20.0 +9/=22/-9 50.00%
Stockfish 070913 64 SSE4.2_ - Komodo 5.1r2 64-bitx6nob 21.5 - 18.5 +11/=21/-8 53.75%

240 Games x6 cores= [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Score using 6 cores = 133.5-106.5 = 55.62%

i7 975 3.33 Ghz.
4 real cores
Ponder: Off.
GUI: Fritz 12
Book: Perfect 2012c
No tablebases
Hash 256
Relative Speed: 20.62
Knodes per second: 9.899

Time Control_4+0

Stockfish 070913 64 SSE4.2_ - Critter 1.6a 64-bitnob_4 28.0 - 12.0 +18/=20/-2 70.00%
Stockfish 070913 64 SSE4.2_ - Houdini 3 Pro x64_4 20.0 - 20.0 +9/=22/-9 50.00%
Stockfish 070913 64 SSE4.2_ - Komodo 5.1r2 64-bitnob 21.5 - 18.5 +12/=19/-9 53.75%

Time Control_2+2

Stockfish 070913 64 SSE4.2_ - Critter 1.6a 64-bitnob_4 21.5 - 18.5 +10/=23/-7 53.75%
Stockfish 070913 64 SSE4.2_ - Houdini 3 Pro x64_4 22.0 - 18.0 +13/=18/-9 55.00%
Stockfish 070913 64 SSE4.2_ - Komodo 5.1r2 64-bitnob 21.0 - 19.0 +10/=22/-8 52.50%


240 Games X 4 cores= [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Score using 4 Cores = 134.5-105.5 =56.04%

Segmenting the result by Time Control:

Fixed = 57.08%
Incremental = 54.37%

Global Score: 267.5–212.5 = 55.73%
Against Critter 1.6a (3093): 60.31% Houdini 3.0 Pro (3172): 52.81% Komodo 5.1r2 (3135): 54.06%
Average ELO of opponents= 3133
Estimated ELO Performance= 3173


 
 For the first time in my tests, a Stockfish version has performed a bit better than Houdini 3.0 Pro.

The improvement in the last three weeks has been impressive. Congratulations for this historical -from my viewpoint- score to Marco, Gary and all the Stockfish Team.

Regards from Barcelona.

Tom.




 



 

Thank you for the good news!

test is from marijan

Thankyou      

Stockfish 120913 = 480 GAMES

Bench: 4554579 Timestamp: 1378968251

i7 980 3.33 Ghz.
6 real cores
Ponder: Off.
GUI: Fritz 12
Book: Perfect 2012c
No tablebases
Hash 512
Relative Speed: 28.66
Knodes per second: 13.759

Time Control_4+0

Stockfish 120913 64 SSE4.2_ - Critter 1.6a 64-bit_NOB 22.0 - 18.0 +13/=18/-9 55.00%
Stockfish 120913 64 SSE4.2_ - Houdini 3 Pro x64_6 22.5 - 17.5 +14/=17/-9 56.25%
Stockfish 120913 64 SSE4.2_ - Komodo 5.1r2 64-bitx6nob 22.5 - 17.5 +10/=25/-5 56.25%

Time Control_2+2

Stockfish 120913 64 SSE4.2_ - Critter 1.6a 64-bit_NOB 26.5 - 13.5 +15/=23/-2 66.25%
Stockfish 120913 64 SSE4.2_ - Houdini 3 Pro x64_6 20.5 - 19.5 +9/=23/-8 51.25%
Stockfish 120913 64 SSE4.2_ - Komodo 5.1r2 64-bitx6nob 23.0 - 17.0 +10/=26/-4 57.50%

240 Games x6 cores= [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Score using 6 cores = 137.0-103.0 = 57.08%

i7 975 3.33 Ghz.
4 real cores
Ponder: Off.
GUI: Fritz 12
Book: Perfect 2012c
No tablebases
Hash 256
Relative Speed: 20.62
Knodes per second: 9.899

Time Control_4+0

Stockfish 120913 64 SSE4.2_ - Critter 1.6a 64-bitnob_4 22.5 - 17.5 +12/=21/-7 56.25%
Stockfish 120913 64 SSE4.2_ - Houdini 3 Pro x64_4 19.5 - 20.5 +10/=19/-11 48.75%
Stockfish 120913 64 SSE4.2_ - Komodo 5.1r2 64-bitnob 21.5 - 18.5 +9/=25/-6 53.75%

Time Control_2+2

Stockfish 120913 64 SSE4.2_ - Critter 1.6a 64-bitnob_4 21.5 - 18.5 +13/=17/-10 53.75%
Stockfish 120913 64 SSE4.2_ - Houdini 3 Pro x64_4 19.0 - 21.0 +11/=16/-13 47.50%
Stockfish 120913 64 SSE4.2_ - Komodo 5.1r2 64-bitnob 22.5 - 17.5 +15/=15/-10 56.25%

240 Games X 4 cores= [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Score using 4 Cores = 126.5-113.5 = 52.71%

Segmenting the result by Time Control:

Fixed = 130.5-119.5 = 54.37%
Incremental = 133.0-107.0 = 55.42%

Global Score: 263.5-226.5 = 54.90%
Against Critter 1.6a (3093): 57.81% Houdini 3.0 Pro (3172): 50.94% Komodo 5.1r2 (3135): 55.94%

Average ELO of opponents= 3.133
Estimated ELO Performance= 3.167

Another very good score for Stockfish.

Best regards,

Tom.

Goodwork thanks  

In an attempt to minimize the statistical noise, I have retested SH 140913 version.

Stockfish 140913 = 480 GAMES (Second test)

Bench: 3846852 Timestamp: 1379156917

i7 980 3.33 Ghz.
6 real cores
Ponder: Off.
GUI: Fritz 12
Book: Perfect 2012c
No tablebases
Hash 512
Relative Speed: 28.66
Knodes per second: 13.759

Time Control_4+0

Stockfish 140913 64 SSE4.2_ - Critter 1.6a 64-bit_NOB 25.0 - 15.0 +15/=20/-5 62.50%
Stockfish 140913 64 SSE4.2_ - Houdini 3 Pro x64_6 20.0 - 20.0 +9/=22/-9 50.00%
Stockfish 140913 64 SSE4.2_ - Komodo 5.1r2 64-bitx6nob 21.0 - 19.0 +8/=26/-6 52.50%

Time Control_2+2

Stockfish 140913 64 SSE4.2_ - Critter 1.6a 64-bit_NOB 27.5 - 12.5 +16/=23/-1 68.75%
Stockfish 140913 64 SSE4.2_ - Houdini 3 Pro x64_6 20.5 - 19.5 +12/=17/-11 51.25%
Stockfish 140913 64 SSE4.2_ - Komodo 5.1r2 64-bitx6nob 22.5 - 17.5 +10/=25/-5 56.25%

240 Games X6 = [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Score using 6 cores = 136.5-103.5 = 56.87%

i7 975 3.33 Ghz.
4 real cores
Ponder: Off.
GUI: Fritz 12
Book: Perfect 2012c
No tablebases
Hash 256
Relative Speed: 20.62
Knodes per second: 9.899

Time Control_4+0

Stockfish 140913 64 SSE4.2x - Critter 1.6a 64-bitnob_4 22.0 - 18.0 +9/=26/-5 55.00%
Stockfish 140913 64 SSE4.2x - Houdini 3 Pro x64_4 21.0 - 19.0 +9/=24/-7 52.50%
Stockfish 140913 64 SSE4.2x - Komodo 5.1r2 64-bitnob 20.5 - 19.5 +13/=15/-12 51.25%

Time Control_2+2

Stockfish 140913 64 SSE4.2x - Critter 1.6a 64-bitnob_4 26.0 - 14.0 +17/=18/-5 65.00%
Stockfish 140913 64 SSE4.2x - Houdini 3 Pro x64_4 19.5 - 20.5 +11/=17/-12 48.75%
Stockfish 140913 64 SSE4.2x - Komodo 5.1r2 64-bitnob 19.0 - 21.0 +9/=20/-11 47.50%

240 Games X4 = [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Score using 4 Cores = 128.0-112.0 = 53.33%

Segmenting the result by Time Control:

Fixed = 129.5-110.5 = 53.96%
Incremental = 135.0-105.0 = 56.25%


Global Score: 264.5-215.5 = 55.10%

Against Critter 1.6a (3093): 62.81% Houdini 3.0 Pro (3172): 50.62% Komodo 5.1r2 (3135): 51.87%

Average ELO of opponents= 3.133
Estimated ELO Performance= 3.169

--------------------------------------

Summary of tests 1 and 2 of 140913 Version = 960 games

Global Score= 540.5-419.5 = 56.30%
Against Critter 1.6a (3093): 62.03% Houdini 3.0 Pro (3172): 52.81% Komodo 5.1r2 (3135): 54.06%

Average ELO of Opponents= 3.133
Estimated ELO performance= 3.177


Still above Houdini 3.0 after 960 games. I have just started the third and last 480 games test of this version. The strongest one of Stockfish in my tests till now.

Regards,

Tom.




#######






  






 

Thanks for your hard work LondonFrau.

Would your results be any different LondonFrau if you used SSE4.1 instead SSE4.2?

Thankyou good job  

VitruviusH wrote:

Would your results be any different LondonFrau if you used SSE4.1 instead  SSE4.2?

no idea as its not our tests , but do feel free to run some yourself

Is the latest development version of Stockfish always stronger than Stockfish 4? Thanks.

VitruviusH wrote:

Is the latest development version of Stockfish always stronger than Stockfish 4?  Thanks.

most times yes

Thank you LondonFrau!

and this is the third and latest test for this version:

Stockfish 140913 = 480 GAMES (Third test)

Bench: 3846852 Timestamp: 1379156917

i7 980 3.33 Ghz.
6 real cores
Ponder: Off.
GUI: Fritz 12
Book: Perfect 2012c
No tablebases
Hash 512
Relative Speed: 28.66
Knodes per second: 13.759

Time Control_4+0

Stockfish 140913 64 SSE4.2_ - Critter 1.6a 64-bit_NOB 21.0 - 19.0 +9/=24/-7 52.50%
Stockfish 140913 64 SSE4.2_ - Houdini 3 Pro x64_6 25.5 - 14.5 +15/=21/-4 63.75%
Stockfish 140913 64 SSE4.2_ - Komodo 5.1r2 64-bitx6nob 23.0 - 17.0 +14/=18/-8 57.50%

Time Control_2+2

Stockfish 140913 64 SSE4.2_ - Critter 1.6a 64-bit_NOB 25.0 - 15.0 +13/=24/-3 62.50%
Stockfish 140913 64 SSE4.2_ - Houdini 3 Pro x64_6 19.5 - 20.5 +10/=19/-11 48.75%
Stockfish 140913 64 SSE4.2_ - Komodo 5.1r2 64-bitx6nob 21.0 - 19.0 +9/=24/-7 52.50%

240 Games X6 = [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Score using 6 cores = 135.0-105.0 = 56.25%

i7 975 3.33 Ghz.
4 real cores
Ponder: Off.
GUI: Fritz 12
Book: Perfect 2012c
No tablebases
Hash 256
Relative Speed: 20.62
Knodes per second: 9.899

Time Control_4+0

Stockfish 140913 64 SSE4.2x - Critter 1.6a 64-bitnob_4 22.5 - 17.5 +12/=21/-7 56.25%
Stockfish 140913 64 SSE4.2x - Houdini 3 Pro x64_4 19.5 - 20.5 +8/=23/-9 48.75%
Stockfish 140913 64 SSE4.2x - Komodo 5.1r2 64-bitnob 23.0 - 17.0 +12/=22/-6 57.50%

Time Control_2+2

Stockfish 140913 64 SSE4.2x - Critter 1.6a 64-bitnob_4 24.0 - 16.0 +12/=24/-4 60.00%
Stockfish 140913 64 SSE4.2x - Houdini 3 Pro x64_4 20.0 - 20.0 +12/=16/-12 50.00%
Stockfish 140913 64 SSE4.2x - Komodo 5.1r2 64-bitnob 22.0 - 18.0 +11/=22/-7 55.00%

240 Games X4 = [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Score using 4 Cores = 131.0-109.0 = 54.58%

Segmenting the result by Time Control:

Fixed = 134.5-105.5 = 56.04%
Incremental = 131.5-108.5 = 54.79%


Global Score: 266.0-214.0= 55.42%
Against Critter 1.6a (3093): 57.81% Houdini 3.0 Pro (3172): 52.81% Komodo 5.1r2 (3135): 55.62%

Average ELO of opponents= 3.133
Estimated ELO Performance= 3.171

-----------------------

Summary of tests 1 , 2 and 3 = 1.440 games

Global Score= 806.5-633.5 = 56.01%
Against Critter 1.6a (3093): 60.62% Houdini 3.0 Pro (3172): 52.81% Komodo 5.1r2 (3135): 54.58%

Average ELO of Opponents= 3.133
Estimated ELO performance= 3,175

-------------------------

After three tests including 1.440 games, Stockfish 140913 remains somewhat ahead of Houdini 3.0 Pro. Only 3 Elo points in the global estimate (Not relevant. Still within the statistical noise range, despite the number of games), but a more relevant 52.81% score after the 480 games played one–to-one. What a pleasure watching these top level games!.

Under my test settings environment, I can confirm that this is the best Stockfish version so far. I am sure that new improvements will appear soon. Well done, Stockfish TEAM!.

Regards,

Tom.
Tom Casanovas

###############






  






 

Thank you LondonFrau. Nice work! I love it.

 
STOCKFISH 011013 (IPMAN COMPILE) Test 2 and 3 = 960 GAMES

i7 980 3.33 Ghz.
6 real cores
Ponder: Off.
GUI: Fritz 12
Book: Perfect 2012c
No tablebases. RTB not installed yet in my computers.
Hash 512
Large Pages ALLOWED
Relative Speed: 28.66
Knodes per second: 13.759

Time Control_4+0

201310SF011013ST66_4+0_240games_IPMAN_2 2013

Stockfish 011013 64 SSE4.2I - Critter 1.6a 64-bit_NOB 44.0 - 36.0 +21/=46/-13 55.00%
Stockfish 011013 64 SSE4.2I - Houdini 3 Pro x64_6 47.0 - 33.0 +29/=36/-15 58.75%
Stockfish 011013 64 SSE4.2I - Komodo 5.1r2 64-bitx6nob 45.5 - 34.5 +24/=43/-13 56.88%

Time Control_2+2

201310SF011013ST66_2+_240games_IPMAN_2_ 2013

Stockfish 011013 64 SSE4.2I - Critter 1.6a 64-bit_NOB 44.0 - 36.0 +19/=50/-11 55.00%
Stockfish 011013 64 SSE4.2I - Houdini 3 Pro x64_6 32.5 - 47.5 +14/=37/-29 40.63%
Stockfish 011013 64 SSE4.2I - Komodo 5.1r2 64-bitx6nob 45.0 - 35.0 +22/=46/-12 56.25%

240 Games X 6 Cores = [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Score using 6 cores = 258.0-222.0 = 53.75%

i7 975 3.33 Ghz.
4 real cores
Ponder: Off.
GUI: Fritz 12
Book: Perfect 2012c
No tablebases
Hash 256
Large Pages ALLOWED
Relative Speed: 20.62
Knodes per second: 9.899

Time Control_4+0

Stockfish 011013 64 SSE4.2I - Critter 1.6a 64-bitnob_4 52.0 - 28.0 +32/=40/-8 65.00%
Stockfish 011013 64 SSE4.2I - Houdini 3 Pro x64_4 35.5 - 44.5 +14/=43/-23 44.38%
Stockfish 011013 64 SSE4.2I - Komodo 5.1r2 64-bitnob 50.5 - 29.5 +28/=45/-7 63.13%

Time Control_2+2

Stockfish 011013 64 SSE4.2I - Critter 1.6a 64-bitnob_4 49.0 - 31.0 +26/=46/-8 61.25%
Stockfish 011013 64 SSE4.2I - Houdini 3 Pro x64_4 42.5 - 37.5 +20/=45/-15 53.13%
Stockfish 011013 64 SSE4.2I - Komodo 5.1r2 64-bitnob 48.5 - 31.5 +30/=37/-13 60.63%

240 Games X 4 Cores = [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Score using 4 Cores = 278.0-202.0 = 57.92%

Segmenting the result by Time Control:

Fixed = 274.5 – 205.5 = 57.19%
Incremental = 261.5 – 218.5 = 54.48%

Global Score: 536.0 – 424.0 = 55.83%
Against Critter 1.6a (3093): 59.06% Houdini 3.0 Pro (3172): 49.22% Komodo 5.1r2 (3135): 59.22%

Average ELO of opponents= 3.133
Estimated ELO Performance= 3.174

--------------------------------------------------


Summary of tests 1 , 2 and 3 = 1.440 games

Global Score= 810.0-630.0 = 56.25%
Against Critter 1.6a (3093): 58.85% Houdini 3.0 Pro (3172): 50.94% Komodo 5.1r2 (3135): 58.96%

Average ELO of Opponents= 3.133
Estimated ELO performance= 3.177

-------------------------------------------------------


After three tests including 1.440 games, Stockfish 011013 Ipman remains ahead of Houdini 3.0 Pro. It has been approximately 6 ELO points better than Houdini 3.0 Pro under my testing conditions.

This is the best Stockfish in my tests so far with a small improvement (2 Estimated ELO points) over 140813 version.

Regards,


Tom Casanovas  Spain

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

!! latest version !! Windows x64 for modern computers + sse4.2 Windows x64 for modern computers Windows x64 Windows 32 Linux x64 for modern computers + sse4.2 Linux x64 for modern computers Linux x64

Author: Lucas Braesch Date: Sat Oct 5 18:12:52 2013 +0200 Timestamp: 1380989572 Use double everywhere Rationale: - Speed of double and float is about the same (not on the hot path anyway) - Double makes code prettier (no need to write 1.0f, just 1.0) - Only practical advantage of float is to use less memory, but since we never store large arrays of double, we don't care.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]


 


  


 

---

     

stockfish 141013 With Large Pages (Peterpan compile) = 480 games.

Compile + Sources (Prepared by Peterpan) = [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

i7 980 3.33 Ghz.
6 real cores
Ponder: Off.
GUI: Fritz 12
Book: Perfect 2012c
No tablebases. No RTB used.
Large Pages: Allowed.
Hash 512
Relative Speed: 28.66
Knodes per second: 13.759

Time Control_4+0

Stockfish 141013SL 64 SSE4.2L - Critter 1.6a 64-bit_NOB 28.0 - 12.0 +19/=18/-3 70.00%
Stockfish 141013SL 64 SSE4.2L - Houdini 3 Pro x64_6 25.0 - 15.0 +16/=18/-6 62.50%
Stockfish 141013SL 64 SSE4.2L - Komodo 6 64-bitx6NOB 20.0 - 20.0 +9/=22/-9 50.00%

Time Control_2+2

Stockfish 141013SL 64 SSE4.2L - Critter 1.6a 64-bitX6_NOB 25.0 - 15.0 +12/=26/-2 62.50%
Stockfish 141013SL 64 SSE4.2L - Houdini 3 Pro x64_6 22.0 - 18.0 +12/=20/-8 55.00%
Stockfish 141013SL 64 SSE4.2L - Komodo 6 64-bitx6NOB 22.0 - 18.0 +12/=20/-8 55.00%

240 Games X 6 Cores = [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Score using 6 cores = 142.0- 98.0 = 59.17%

i7 975 3.33 Ghz.
4 real cores
Ponder: Off.
GUI: Fritz 12
Book: Perfect 2012c
No tablebases. No RTB used.
Large Pages Allowed.
Hash 256
Relative Speed: 20.62
Knodes per second: 9.899

Time Control_4+0

Stockfish 141013SL 64 SSE4.2L - Critter 1.6a 64-bitnob_4 21.0 - 19.0 +9/=24/-7 52.50%
Stockfish 141013SL 64 SSE4.2L - Houdini 3 Pro x64_4 22.0 - 18.0 +14/=16/-10 55.00%
Stockfish 141013SL 64 SSE4.2L - Komodo 6 64-bitx4_NOB 22.0 - 18.0 +12/=20/-8 55.00%

Time Control_2+2

Stockfish 141013SL 64 SSE4.2L - Critter 1.6a 64-bitnob_4 22.5 - 17.5 +11/=23/-6 56.25%
Stockfish 141013SL 64 SSE4.2L - Houdini 3 Pro x64_4 23.0 - 17.0 +11/=24/-5 57.50%
Stockfish 141013SL 64 SSE4.2L - Komodo 6 64-bitx4_NOB 25.0 - 15.0 +14/=22/-4 62.50%

240 games X 4 Cores = [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Score using 4 Cores = 135.5-104.5 = 56.46%

Segmenting the result by Time Control:

Fixed = 138.0-102.0 = 57.50%
Incremental = 139.5 – 100.5 = 58.12%

Global Score: 277.5 – 102.5 = 57.81%
Against Critter 1.6a (3093): 60.31% Houdini 3.0 Pro (3172): 57.50% Komodo 6 (3154): 55.62%

Average ELO of opponents= 3.140
Estimated ELO Performance= 3.195



   
New best score ever for Stockfish in my tests.

Only a few comments:

1.- This result is simply amazing. Estimated ELO 23 points ahead of Houdini 3.0 Pro, 41 points ahead of Komodo 6 and 18 points ahead of the same engine without Large Pages.

2.- Please note that as a simple tester I don't want state anything about the use of Large Pages. I don't know even how they work. My only purpose is to offer my tests and the games, so that everyone can build their own opinion.

A big THANKS to the Stockfish Team for their incredible work, and also to my friend Peterpan with this stable compile with Large Pages allowed.

Best regards from Barcelona.



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Large pages merely offer a slight increase in speed  to the engines using them



 

 

 

 

---

Stockfish 181013 = 480 Games.

Bench: 8440524 Timestamp: 1382114978

i7 980 3.33 Ghz.
6 real cores
Ponder: Off.
GUI: Fritz 12
Book: Perfect 2012c
No tablebases. No RTB used.
Hash 512
Relative Speed: 28.66
Knodes per second: 13.759

Time Control_4+0

Stockfish 181013 64 SSE4.2_ - Critter 1.6a 64-bitX6_NOB_ 25.0 - 15.0 +14/=22/-4 62.50%
Stockfish 181013 64 SSE4.2_ - Houdini 3 Pro x64_6 21.5 - 18.5 +12/=19/-9 53.75%
Stockfish 181013 64 SSE4.2_ - Komodo 6 64-bitx6NOB 22.5 - 17.5 +10/=25/-5 56.25%

Time Control_2+2

Stockfish 181013 64 SSE4.2_ - Critter 1.6a 64-bitX6_NOB 22.5 - 17.5 +9/=27/-4 56.25%
Stockfish 181013 64 SSE4.2_ - Houdini 3 Pro x64_6 20.0 - 20.0 +11/=18/-11 50.00%
Stockfish 181013 64 SSE4.2_ - Komodo 6 64-bitx6NOB 20.5 - 19.5 +10/=21/-9 51.25%

240 Games X 6 Cores = [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Score using 6 cores = 132.0- 108.0 = 55.00%

i7 975 3.33 Ghz.
4 real cores
Ponder: Off.
GUI: Fritz 12
Book: Perfect 2012c
No tablebases. No RTB used.
Hash 256
Relative Speed: 20.62
Knodes per second: 9.899

Time Control_4+0

Stockfish 181013 64 SSE4.2_ - Critter 1.6a 64-bitnob_4 24.0 - 16.0 +13/=22/-5 60.00%
Stockfish 181013 64 SSE4.2_ - Houdini 3 Pro x64_4 20.5 - 19.5 +11/=19/-10 51.25%
Stockfish 181013 64 SSE4.2_ - Komodo 6 64-bitx4_NOB 26.5 - 13.5 +17/=19/-4 66.25%

Time Control_2+2

Stockfish 181013 64 SSE4.2_ - Critter 1.6a 64-bitnob_4 23.0 - 17.0 +12/=22/-6 57.50%
Stockfish 181013 64 SSE4.2_ - Houdini 3 Pro x64_4 24.0 - 16.0 +12/=24/-4 60.00%
Stockfish 181013 64 SSE4.2_ - Komodo 6 64-bitx4_NOB 22.0 - 18.0 +10/=24/-6 55.00%

240 Games X 4 Cores = [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Score using 4 Cores = 140.0-100.0 = 58.33%

Segmenting the result by Time Control:

Fixed = 140.0-100.0 = 58.33%
Incremental = 132.0-108.0 = 55.00%

Global Score: 272.0 – 208.0 = 56.67%
Against Critter 1.6a (3093): 59.06% Houdini 3.0 Pro (3172): 53.75% Komodo 6 (3154): 57.19%

Average ELO of opponents= 3.140
Estimated ELO Performance= 3.187

Another brilliant score for Stockfish. The best one without Large Pages and only 8 Estimated Elo Points below the best score reported in my previous test (where Large Pages were used)

~~~~~~~~~~~



 

 




 

Good work LondonFrau! I am currently building a new computer and so will be able to do what you and your friends do. My present computer just did not have enough power to run test. Thanks be to Newegg!

VitruviusH wrote:

Good work LondonFrau!  I am currently building a new computer and so will be able to do what you  and your friends do.  My present computer just did not have enough power to run test.  Thanks be to Newegg!

 

These stockfish tests are NOT done by us , most of us "Admin" use notebooks now 2 core ones , not desktops

  


  

---

 


I wrote this sentence about 4 weeks ago:

… I can not imagine where Stockfish will be in one month.

Here you have the answer:

Stockfish 111113SL 64 SSE4.2L With Large Pages (Ipman’s Compile) = 480 Games.

i7 980 3.33 Ghz.
6 real cores
Ponder: Off.
GUI: Fritz 12
Book: Perfect 2012c
No tablebases. No RTB used.
Large Pages Allowed
Hash 512
Relative Speed: 28.66
Knodes per second: 13.759

Time Control_4+0

Stockfish 111113SL 64 SSE4.2L - Critter 1.6a 64-bitX6_NOB 27.5 - 12.5 +20/=15/-5 68.75%
Stockfish 111113SL 64 SSE4.2L - Houdini 3 Pro x64_6 25.5 - 14.5 +18/=15/-7 63.75%
Stockfish 111113SL 64 SSE4.2L - Komodo 6 64-bitx6NOB 23.5 - 16.5 +13/=21/-6 58.75%

Time Control_2+2

Stockfish 111113SL 64 SSE4.2L - Critter 1.6a 64-bitX6_NOB 28.5 - 11.5 +17/=23/-0 71.25%
Stockfish 111113SL 64 SSE4.2L - Houdini 3 Pro x64_6 20.5 - 19.5 +9/=23/-8 51.25%
Stockfish 111113SL 64 SSE4.2L - Komodo 6 64-bitx6NOB 21.0 - 19.0 +14/=14/-12 52.50%

240 Games X 6 Cores = [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Score using 6 cores = 146.5 – 93.5 = 61.04%

i7 975 3.33 Ghz.
4 real cores
Ponder: Off.
GUI: Fritz 12
Book: Perfect 2012c
No tablebases. No RTB used.
Large Pages Allowed
Hash 256
Relative Speed: 20.62
Knodes per second: 9.899

Time Control_4+0

Stockfish 111113SL 64 SSE4.2I - Critter 1.6a 64-bitnob_4 28.0 - 12.0 +18/=20/-2 70.00%
Stockfish 111113SL 64 SSE4.2I - Houdini 3 Pro x64_4 22.0 - 18.0 +13/=18/-9 55.00%
Stockfish 111113SL 64 SSE4.2I - Komodo 6 64-bitx4_NOB 24.0 - 16.0 +14/=20/-6 60.00%

Time Control_2+2

Stockfish 111113SL 64 SSE4.2I - Critter 1.6a 64-bitnob_4 23.5 - 16.5 +14/=19/-7 58.75%
Stockfish 111113SL 64 SSE4.2I - Houdini 3 Pro x64_4 26.0 - 14.0 +14/=24/-2 65.00%
Stockfish 111113SL 64 SSE4.2I - Komodo 6 64-bitx4_NOB 27.5 - 12.5 +17/=21/-2 68.75%


240 Games X 4 cores = [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Scores using 4 cores = 151.0 - 89.0 = 62.92%

Segmenting the result by Time Control:

Fixed = 150.5 – 89.5 = 62.71%
Incremental = 147.0 – 93.0 = 61.25%

Global Score: 297.5 – 182.5= 61.98%
Against Critter 1.6a (3093): 67.19% Houdini 3.0 Pro (3172): 58.75% Komodo 6 (3154): 60.00%

Average ELO of opponents= 3.140
Estimated ELO Performance= 3.224

According to this test, this Ipman’s compile of Stockfish, using Large Pages but not tablebases, is:

52 ELO points above Houdini 3.0 Pro.
70 ELO points above Komodo 6 and
131 ELO points above Critter 1.6a

I can not find any adjective to explain this incredible score. If you have a bit of minuts spare, please give a look, randomly, to some games.

Best regards from Barcelona.
Tom Casanovas

#######

 

  

 

LondonFrau wrote:

---

 


I wrote this sentence about 4 weeks ago:

… I can not imagine where Stockfish will be in one month.

Here you have the answer:

Stockfish 111113SL 64 SSE4.2L With Large Pages (Ipman’s Compile) = 480 Games.

i7 980 3.33 Ghz.
6 real cores
Ponder: Off.
GUI: Fritz 12
Book: Perfect 2012c
No tablebases. No RTB used.
Large Pages Allowed
Hash 512
Relative Speed: 28.66
Knodes per second: 13.759

Time Control_4+0

Stockfish 111113SL 64 SSE4.2L - Critter 1.6a 64-bitX6_NOB 27.5 - 12.5 +20/=15/-5 68.75%
Stockfish 111113SL 64 SSE4.2L - Houdini 3 Pro x64_6 25.5 - 14.5 +18/=15/-7 63.75%
Stockfish 111113SL 64 SSE4.2L - Komodo 6 64-bitx6NOB 23.5 - 16.5 +13/=21/-6 58.75%

Time Control_2+2

Stockfish 111113SL 64 SSE4.2L - Critter 1.6a 64-bitX6_NOB 28.5 - 11.5 +17/=23/-0 71.25%
Stockfish 111113SL 64 SSE4.2L - Houdini 3 Pro x64_6 20.5 - 19.5 +9/=23/-8 51.25%
Stockfish 111113SL 64 SSE4.2L - Komodo 6 64-bitx6NOB 21.0 - 19.0 +14/=14/-12 52.50%

240 Games X 6 Cores = [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Score using 6 cores = 146.5 – 93.5 = 61.04%

i7 975 3.33 Ghz.
4 real cores
Ponder: Off.
GUI: Fritz 12
Book: Perfect 2012c
No tablebases. No RTB used.
Large Pages Allowed
Hash 256
Relative Speed: 20.62
Knodes per second: 9.899

Time Control_4+0

Stockfish 111113SL 64 SSE4.2I - Critter 1.6a 64-bitnob_4 28.0 - 12.0 +18/=20/-2 70.00%
Stockfish 111113SL 64 SSE4.2I - Houdini 3 Pro x64_4 22.0 - 18.0 +13/=18/-9 55.00%
Stockfish 111113SL 64 SSE4.2I - Komodo 6 64-bitx4_NOB 24.0 - 16.0 +14/=20/-6 60.00%

Time Control_2+2

Stockfish 111113SL 64 SSE4.2I - Critter 1.6a 64-bitnob_4 23.5 - 16.5 +14/=19/-7 58.75%
Stockfish 111113SL 64 SSE4.2I - Houdini 3 Pro x64_4 26.0 - 14.0 +14/=24/-2 65.00%
Stockfish 111113SL 64 SSE4.2I - Komodo 6 64-bitx4_NOB 27.5 - 12.5 +17/=21/-2 68.75%


240 Games X 4 cores = [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Scores using 4 cores = 151.0 - 89.0 = 62.92%

Segmenting the result by Time Control:

Fixed = 150.5 – 89.5 = 62.71%
Incremental = 147.0 – 93.0 = 61.25%

Global Score: 297.5 – 182.5= 61.98%
Against Critter 1.6a (3093): 67.19% Houdini 3.0 Pro (3172): 58.75% Komodo 6 (3154): 60.00%

Average ELO of opponents= 3.140
Estimated ELO Performance= 3.224

According to this test, this Ipman’s compile of Stockfish, using Large Pages but not tablebases, is:

52 ELO points above Houdini 3.0 Pro.
70 ELO points above Komodo 6 and
131 ELO points above Critter 1.6a

I can not find any adjective to explain this incredible score. If you have a bit of minuts spare, please give a look, randomly, to some games.

Best regards from Barcelona.
Tom Casanovas

#######

 

  

 

That one is here:

coutosey of Goldminer 999

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

 



TESTING Stockfish 161113SL 64 SSE4.2L With Large Pages (Ipman’s Compile) = 480 Games.

i7 980 3.33 Ghz.
6 real cores
Ponder: Off.
GUI: Fritz 12
Book: Perfect 2012c
No tablebases. No RTB used.
Large Pages Allowed
Hash 512
Relative Speed: 28.66
Knodes per second: 13.759

Time Control_4+0

Stockfish 161113SL 64 SSE4.2L - Critter 1.6a 64-bitX6_NOB 26.5 - 13.5 +17/=19/-4 66.25%
Stockfish 161113SL 64 SSE4.2L - Houdini 3 Pro x64_6 22.5 - 17.5 +14/=17/-9 56.25%
Stockfish 161113SL 64 SSE4.2L - Komodo 6 64-bitx6NOB 23.5 - 16.5 +13/=21/-6 58.75%

Time Control_2+2

Stockfish 161113SL 64 SSE4.2L - Critter 1.6a 64-bitX6_NOB 25.5 - 14.5 +16/=19/-5 63.75%
Stockfish 161113SL 64 SSE4.2L - Houdini 3 Pro x64_6 19.5 - 20.5 +10/=19/-11 48.75%
Stockfish 161113SL 64 SSE4.2L - Komodo 6 64-bitx6NOB 22.0 - 18.0 +11/=22/-7 55.00%

240 Games X 6 Cores = [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Score using 6 cores = 139.5 – 100.5 = 58.12%

i7 975 3.33 Ghz.
4 real cores
Ponder: Off.
GUI: Fritz 12
Book: Perfect 2012c
No tablebases. No RTB used.
Large Pages Allowed
Hash 256
Relative Speed: 20.62
Knodes per second: 9.899

Time Control_4+0

Stockfish 161113SL 64 SSE4.2L - Critter 1.6a 64-bitnob_4 19.0 - 21.0 +6/=26/-8 47.50%
Stockfish 161113SL 64 SSE4.2L - Houdini 3 Pro x64_4 25.5 - 14.5 +16/=19/-5 63.75%
Stockfish 161113SL 64 SSE4.2L - Komodo 6 64-bitx4_NOB 22.5 - 17.5 +13/=19/-8 56.25%

Time Control_2+2

Stockfish 161113SL 64 SSE4.2L - Critter 1.6a 64-bitnob_4 27.5 - 12.5 +17/=21/-2 68.75%
Stockfish 161113SL 64 SSE4.2L - Houdini 3 Pro x64_4 24.0 - 16.0 +12/=24/-4 60.00%
Stockfish 161113SL 64 SSE4.2L - Komodo 6 64-bitx4_NOB 25.5 - 14.5 +15/=21/-4 63.75%

240 Games X 4 cores = [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Scores using 4 cores = 144.0 – 96.0 = 60.00%

Segmenting the result by Time Control:

Fixed = 139.5 – 100.5 = 58.12%
Incremental = 144.0 – 96.0 = 60.00%

Global Score: 283.5 – 196.5 = 59.06%
Against Critter 1.6a (3093): 61.56% Houdini 3.0 Pro (3172): 57.19% Komodo 6 (3154): 58.44%

Average ELO of opponents= 3.140
Estimated ELO Performance= 3.203

Not so brilliant as the Ipman's 111113SL version, but this is the second best score ever in my tests.

Regards,

Tom.




~~~~~