chessforyou Bettina&Terry77
chessforyou Bettina&Terry77
chessforyou Bettina&Terry77
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

chessforyou Bettina&Terry77


 
HomeLatest imagesRegisterLog in
WELCOME TO FORUM OF Angels77 * named in memory of Bettina & Terry
Search
 
 

Display results as :
 
Rechercher Advanced Search
Search
 
 

Display results as :
 
Rechercher Advanced Search
Latest topics
Latest topics
Navigation
 Portal
 Index
 Memberlist
 Profile
 FAQ
 Search
Navigation
 Portal
 Index
 Memberlist
 Profile
 FAQ
 Search
Forum
Forum
Affiliates
free forum
 


Affiliates
free forum
 



 

 SF 160916 VS Komodo 10.1 long time control by Dominici Pierre

Go down 
AuthorMessage
LondonFrau
Admin
Admin
LondonFrau


Female Posts : 1294
Reputation : 3534
Join date : 2010-02-27
Location : ???

SF 160916 VS Komodo 10.1 long time control    by Dominici Pierre Empty
PostSubject: SF 160916 VS Komodo 10.1 long time control by Dominici Pierre   SF 160916 VS Komodo 10.1 long time control    by Dominici Pierre EmptyMon Oct 03, 2016 6:55 pm

a match between SF and K @ long time control 40'+40''.

i7-6950x @4.4GHz
10 threads
hash 4096 MB/engine
ponder off
no book
all other settings set to default
games : 100
Aquarium GUI

starting positions "Noomen Short lines Testsuite 2015"



1: stockfish_x64_bmi2160916 49.0 / 80 =1======10===1=1=1=1=====1=1===1=1=1=1===1===================1===011=1=11==1==== (+20 -2 =58) c c h
2: Komodo 10.1 64-bit 31.0 / 80 =0======01===0=0=0=0=====0=0===0=0=0=0===0===================0===100=0=00==0==== (+2 -20 =58) wtr


 
+20-2 is a clear win for stockfish.
A 84 games test is of course shorter than a 100 games test, but no skepticism should be raised because 16 games have not been played....
Come on ! Don't debate about what has not been played, but about what has been played !
Don't forget I'm using Stockfish BMI version from [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] which is 8-9 % faster than abrok.eu site, which means my results will always show a better performance for stockfish against komodo, compared to testers who run tests with stockfish from abrok.eu site !! This has to be taken into account when you judge the 20-2 result . If you ask I can run a quick match between SF from ultimaiq and stockfish from abrok, you will realize the difference in strength...


20-2 is insane. In fact this type of a smashing is probably a bad sign for Houdini when it plays in the superfinal. If my speculation is correct and Houdini development still is not at Komodo's level then it will be absolutely pounded. You do not need to run Stockfish Abrok versus the Ultimaiq compiles. I have access to another tournament (private) where Komodo is being crushed quite severely. You should run this same tournament but with asmFish. The asmFish compile is 16 percent faster than the Ultimaiq compiles.

Stockfish is just too strong now. It looks like all of those patches over the last few months have effectively taken their toll; also I would speculate that Lazy SMP is better than what it was when it was first coded into Stockfish during last season's TCEC.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]


PGN  Available soon

_________________
Bettina...............The greatest happiness of life is the conviction that we are loved.

Victor Hugo
Back to top Go down
 
SF 160916 VS Komodo 10.1 long time control by Dominici Pierre
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
chessforyou Bettina&Terry77 :: ENGlNES :: tests and tournements-
Jump to: