chessforyou Bettina&Terry77
chessforyou Bettina&Terry77
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

chessforyou Bettina&Terry77


 
HomeRegisterLog in
WELCOME TO FORUM OF Angels77 * named in memory of Bettina & Terry
Search
 
 

Display results as :
 
Rechercher Advanced Search
Search
 
 

Display results as :
 
Rechercher Advanced Search
Latest topics
Latest topics
Navigation
 Portal
 Index
 Memberlist
 Profile
 FAQ
 Search
Navigation
 Portal
 Index
 Memberlist
 Profile
 FAQ
 Search
Forum
Forum
Affiliates
free forum
 


Affiliates
free forum
 



 

 Latest abrok Development Versions July11th (SF The gift that keeps on giving) EVEN MORE ELO

Go down 
AuthorMessage
"B"
Admin
Admin
Latest abrok Development Versions July11th (SF The gift that keeps on giving) EVEN MORE ELO 93-65

Female Posts : 999
Reputation : 3727
Join date : 2010-01-17
Location : undetermined

Latest abrok Development Versions July11th (SF The gift that keeps on giving) EVEN MORE ELO Empty
PostSubject: Latest abrok Development Versions July11th (SF The gift that keeps on giving) EVEN MORE ELO   Latest abrok Development Versions July11th (SF The gift that keeps on giving) EVEN MORE ELO EmptySun Jul 12, 2020 5:21 pm

Windows x64 for Haswell CPUs
Windows x64 for modern computers
Windows x64
Windows 32
Linux x64 for Haswell CPUs
Linux x64 for modern computers
Linux x64
Author: SFisGOD
Date: Sat Jul 11 11:23:55 2020 +0200
Timestamp: 1594459435

Introduce bad outpost penalty

In some French games, Stockfish likes to bring the Knight to a bad outpost spot. This is evident in TCEC S18 Superfinal Game 63, where there is a Knight outpost on the queenside but is actually useless. Stockfish is effectively playing a piece down while holding ground against Leela's break on the kingside.

This patch turns the +56 mg bonus for a Knight outpost into a -7 mg penalty if it satisfies the following conditions:

* The outpost square is not on the CenterFiles (i.e. not on files C,D,E and F)
* The knight is not attacking non pawn enemies.
* The side where the outpost is located contains only few enemies, with a particular conditional_more_than_two() implementation

Thank you to for bringing this to our attention and for providing insights.
See https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/fishcooking/dEXNzSIBgZU
Reference game: https://tcec-chess.com/#div=sf&game=63&season=18

Passed STC:
LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.50,1.50}
Total: 6960 W: 1454 L: 1247 D: 4259 Elo +10.34
Ptnml(0-2): 115, 739, 1610, 856, 160
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5f08221059f6f0353289477e

Passed LTC:
LLR: 2.98 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.75}
Total: 21440 W: 2767 L: 2543 D: 16130 Elo +3.63
Ptnml(0-2): 122, 1904, 6462, 2092, 140
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5f0838ed59f6f035328947a2

various related tests show strong test results, but so far no generalizations or simplifications of conditional_more_than_two() are found. See PR for details.

closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/2803

Bench: 4366686
Windows x64 for Haswell CPUs
Windows x64 for modern computers
Windows x64
Windows 32
Linux x64 for Haswell CPUs
Linux x64 for modern computers
Linux x64
Author: Vizvezdenec
Date: Sat Jul 11 11:10:06 2020 +0200
Timestamp: 1594458606

Maximize usage of transposition table in probcut

Probcut is a heuristic that wasn't changed a lot in past years,
all attempts to change it using information / writing info to transposition table failed.

This patch has a number of differences that can be summarized as follows:

* For TT write/read we use depth - 3. Because probcut search is depth - 4 but we actually do the move prior to it so effectively we do depth - 3 search;
* In any case of depth of eval from transposition table being >= depth - 3 we either produce cutoff or refuse to even do probcut search, this is allowing us to write info of probcut to transposition table because we know that we wouldn't be overwriting some deeper data with our depth - 3 search - this is an important aspect of this patch;
* For some not really known reason this patch completely ignores tte->bound() - which was the case for previous patch that made probcut interact with TT, maybe 2) is the reason, although it's unproven.

A first version of this patch passed STC and LTC

passed STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5f05908a59f6f03532894613
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.50,1.50}
Total: 95776 W: 18300 L: 17973 D: 59503 Elo +1.19
Ptnml(0-2): 1646, 10944, 22377, 11279, 1642

passed LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5f06b54059f6f035328946bb
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.75}
Total: 57128 W: 7266 L: 6938 D: 42924 Elo +1.99
Ptnml(0-2): 372, 5163, 17217, 5389, 423

However, an additional bugfix was needed to avoid checking a condition on ttMove if was not available. This passed non-regression bounds on top of the first version:

at STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5f080e5059f6f03532894766
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {-1.50,0.50}
Total: 14096 W: 2800 L: 2628 D: 8668 Elo +4.24
Ptnml(0-2): 225, 1620, 3238, 1688, 277

at LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5f0836a559f6f0353289479c
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) {-1.50,0.50}
Total: 25352 W: 3228 L: 3139 D: 18985 Elo +1.22
Ptnml(0-2): 175, 2350, 7549, 2415, 187

closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/2804

Bench 4540940

_________________
looking for Bettina

Clair Ph.U.K likes this post

Back to top Go down
http://chessagame.blogspot.com
 
Latest abrok Development Versions July11th (SF The gift that keeps on giving) EVEN MORE ELO
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
chessforyou Bettina&Terry77 :: ENGlNES :: ALL ENGlNES :: ENGlNES & CODES :: Stockfish-
Jump to: