Stockfish vs Lc0 longtime testing ("SuFi for the poor") Each testrun 300 games with 150 Noomen lowdraw-openings (selected openings from TCEC superfinals) and 5'+3'' thinking-time (Lc0) / 7.5'+4.5'' (Stockfish). This thinking-time gives a perfect Leela-Ratio of 1.0 on the used PC hardware: i7-8750H 2.6GHz (Hexacore, TurboBoost mode off) Notebook, RTX 2060 GPU. Average game-duration: 20 minutes. Stockfish (running on 11 hyperthreading-threads, Intel Turbo-Mode off)
9000 kn/s, Lc0 (with old 32930 20x256 net) on RTX 2060 mobile:
16000 n/s in starting position.
Hash / NN Cache: 4096 GB Hash for Stockfish / 10000000 NN-Cachesize for Lc0
GUI: Cutechess-cli (GUI ends game, when a 5-piece endgame is on the board)
Tablebases: None for engines, 5 Syzygy for cutechess-cli
Openings: 150 Noomen lowdraws openings (J. Noomen selected non-drawish openings out of his TCEC superfinal openings of previous TCEC seasons). Download
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]Ponder, Large Memory Pages & learning: Off
Thinking time:
Lc0 5'+3'' and
Stockfish 7.5'+4.5'' (means a perfect
Leela-Ratio of 1.0). Average game-duration: 20 minutes.
Download all played games [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] Latest update: 2021/03/06 Stockfish 210226 vs Lc0 0.27.0 67741See some short and spectacular wins of this match directly here on the website in the "View SF vs Lc0 games"- section!Stockfish 210226 bmi2 vs Lc0 0.27.0 67741 : 300 (+ 75,=205,- 20), 59.2 % (+65 Elo)
Stockfish 201225 bmi2 vs Lc0 0.26.3 66680 : 300 (+ 60,=223,- 17), 57.2 % (+50 Elo)
Stockfish 201022 bmi2 vs Lc0 0.26.3 J92-260 : 300 (+ 75,=207,- 18), 59.5 % (+67 Elo)
Stockfish 200928 bmi2 vs Lc0 0.26.3rc2 J92-190: 300 (+ 68,=215,- 17), 58.5 % (+60 Elo)
Stockfish 12 bmi2 vs Lc0 0.26.2 J92-130: 300 (+ 74,=203,- 23), 58.5 % (+60 Elo)
SF 200823 82215d0fd0df vs Lc0 0.26.1 t60-4619: 300 (+ 85,=199,- 16), 61.5 % (+82 Elo)
SF 200810 112bb1c8cdb5 vs Lc0 0.26.1 LS 15: 300 (+ 78,=196,- 26), 58.7 % (+62 Elo)