Vlad0 writes
Vladimir Molotkov
to me
show details 4:45 PM (35 minutes ago)
Hello girls
Yesterday I found the simple optimization of IVH missed somehow by decembrists.
And this night ran a standard battle of the new compile,
optimized (and with "no bug" fixed), with Houdini. The result
1 Ivanhoe 52hUS-x64 +9 +41/=123/-36 51.25% 102.5/200
2 Houdini 1.01 x64 2_CPU -9 +36/=123/-41 48.75% 97.5/200
was pleasant -- the win of IVH though a small, but with older compiles
it was not observed for a long time already. But it was unclear, whether this
result was due to the new optimization of IVH, or just a statistical fluctuation?
To check this I've ran a quicky 50 games bullet 10". The result here
1 Houdini 1.01 x64 2_CPU +28 +14/=26/-10 54.00% 27.0/50
2 Ivanhoe 52hUS-x64 -28 +10/=26/-14 46.00% 23.0/50
as well was a surprise. Though IVH was behind Houdini yet,
but in the similar match 2 days before, with non-optimized IVH, the result was much worse:
1 Houdini 1.01 x64 2_CPU +123 +25/=17/-8 67.00% 33.5/50
2 Ivanhoe 52gUS-x64 -123 +8/=17/-25 33.00% 16.5/50.
This shows that the new IVH is really quicker than the old one.
Which is confirmed by visual observation of games as well.
One can see also, that in bullet regime the time management of IVH
is worse than that of Houdini, though speeds of both engines are visually
the same, IVH much more often looses due to timeouts.
The new compile is attached, and now I'll download it
to Immortal's as well.
http://www.multiupload.com/TS063D2B4L~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
confused by silly bullet 10 second games test we asked ....
is this engine stronger than 52gU ?
and support large pages ?
Vlad answered...
Definitely! It is just quicker "g" version with killed "no move" bug!
Of course! Nothing is removed from g!
Vlad0